Tax & Trade Blog

The trade relationship between the United States (“US”) and Canada received a brief period of reprieve with the recent 30-day postponement of President Trump’s blanket tariffs and Canada’s retaliatory countermeasures.  Despite this intermission, the US and Canada appear set to face off again with tariffs and other countermeasures, much like their counterparts on the ice in the nations face off. 

President Trump has shown a willingness to continue his strategy of cajoling Canada into trade concessions, as evidenced by his February 10, 2025, executive order imposing a 25% tariff on all steel and aluminum imports entering the US.  While there may be legitimate questions about the legality of such tariffs, in this dispute where the refs are off the ice the size of the US economy is a major advantage.

Canada’s packaging and labelling laws are important for anyone selling or importing products for retail, and for consumers wishing to make informed choices about their purchases.  Navigating these laws can be difficult as they are often found in several places.  In this Report we will provide some examples of Canada’s diverse packaging and labelling laws.  

The Rules and Where to Find Them

The basic rules regarding product packaging and labelling in Canada can be found in the Consumer Packaging and Labelling Act, mandating that the following be present:

For frequent travelers between Canada and the United States, the opportunity to save time at the border and make use of the NEXUS entry process is alluring.  Applying for NEXUS is a labour-intensive process, and after submitting some applicants may be surprised to find their applications rejected.  Not all hope is lost, however.  In this Report we review appeal rights, and why specialized assistance will usually be required, if results are to be maximized.  

Why was my NEXUS application denied?

The 30-day moratorium on Trump’s and Canadian retaliatory tariffs should give Canadian importers and exporters some breathing room.  But that breathing room ought to be put to good use considering current duty minimization opportunities, with the future possible implementation of these tariffs in mind.  “Unbundling” is one technique for dealing with punitive tariffs and is reviewed here.

What is Unbundling?

While we are generalizing here, unbundling involves lawfully stripping away non-dutiable components from otherwise dutiable goods.  When goods are imported into a country, the value of those goods needs to be determined so that the proper amount of duty can be applied.  Both Canada and the United States (“US”) are parties to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (the “GATT”) and employ a version of the GATT Valuation Code.  Under that code, the “transaction value” method is the primary system, and focusses on the “price paid or payable” for the imported goods, plus certain additions and less certain deductions.

On January 13, 2025, the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the “CITT”) announced its Finding in Inquiry NQ-2024-003 (the “Finding”) reporting that the dumping of certain hot-rolled deformed steel concrete reinforcing bar in straight lengths or coils, commonly known as rebar, originating in or exported from the Republic of Bulgaria (Bulgaria), the Kingdom of Thailand (Thailand), and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) (the “Subject Goods”) had caused injury to the domestic industry.

New Anti-Dumping Duties (“ADDs”) now apply to certain Subject Goods imported into Canada and released after January 13, 2025.