CALL US TODAY
(416) 864 - 6200

Tax & Trade Blog

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Archives
    Archives Contains a list of blog posts that were created previously.

CBSA Investigating Imports of Drill Pipes

Posted by on in Customs & Trade Blog
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 1026
  • 0 Comments
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

On March 25, 2022 the Canada Border Services Agency (the “CBSA”) issued a Notice of Initiation of Investigation under the Special Import Measures Act (“SIMA”) of alleged dumping and subsidizing of “Drill Pipes” originating in or exported from the People’s Republic of China. This investigation was prompted by a complaint filed by Command Drilling Products Ltd. of Nisku, Alberta.

Subject Goods

The Subject Goods under investigation are currently defined as: Drill pipe, including heavy weight drill pipe (HWDP), meeting or manufactured to American Petroleum Institute (API) 5DP or API 7‑1 specifications, or comparable or proprietary standards, in all grades (including proprietary or enhanced grades), made of carbon or alloy steel, in nominal sizes of 2⅜” (outside diameter 60.3 mm) to 7 ⅝” (outside diameter 193.7 mm) (with all dimensions being plus or minus allowable tolerances contained in the applicable standards), in any length, originating in or exported from the People’s Republic of China.

Additional information on the current investigation will be available by April 8, 2022 when CBSA publishes its Statement of Reasons.

If anti-dumping/countervailing duties are imposed, it will effectively increase costs of the Subject Goods to consumers in Canada.

What are the next steps?

Under SIMA, the matter will proceed along two parallel tracks: (1) the Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the “CITT”) has 60 days to make a preliminary determination as to whether the domestic industry has been injured by the alleged dumping; and (2) the CBSA has 90 days to make a preliminary determination as to whether the goods are being dumped/subsidized (and to determine provisional anti-dumping duties).

While this timeline may be extended by 45 days for complex cases, at this point the CITT’s preliminary determination is expected by May 24, 2022, and CBSA’s preliminary determination by June 23, 2022, followed by a Statement of Reasons 15 days later.

In order to ensure that CBSA has sufficient time to consider the data it receives from the industry, all importers and exporters who have received a questionnaire (or want to obtain specific normal values for their goods) should respond to CBSA’s “Request for Information” (“RFI”) by no later than April 19, 2022 and May 2, 2022 respectively.

Assuming CBSA makes a preliminary determination of dumping on June 23, 2022, the matter proceeds on two parallel tracks again: (1) the CBSA has 90 days to make a final determination as to whether the goods are being dumped/subsidized and to determine any specific normal values for individual exporters; and (2) the CITT has 120 days to make a final determination as to whether the domestic industry has been injured by the alleged dumping.  

The CBSA’s final determination of dumping is expected by September 21, 2022 (at which point exporters who fully cooperated with the CBSA will also be notified of their specific normal values), with a Final Statement of Reasons 15 days later. The CITT’s final determination is expected by October 20, 2022.

What can I do?

Given the strict timelines, and the significant amount of work involved in responding to RFIs, any importers or exporters potentially impacted by this Investigation and the eventual anti-dumping/countervailing duties should contact their lawyer immediately to discuss recommended next steps – regardless of whether or not you have received an RFI/Questionnaire!

It may also be possible to request the CITT to consider whether your goods should be excluded from the Subject Goods definition – typically on the basis that the goods are unique and the domestic industry is not capable of producing a substitutable product. Again contact your lawyer immediately if you think your product should qualify for an exclusion.  

Do you require assistance in this area?  If so, please click here.

Want a PDF copy of this blog?

Last modified on
0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Saturday, 23 November 2024

Toronto Office

10 Lower Spadina Avenue, Suite 200, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2Z2 Canada
Phone: (416) 864-6200| Fax: (416) 864-6201

Client Login

To access the Millar Kreklewetz LLP secure client file transfer system, please log in.