CALL US TODAY
(416) 864 - 6200

Tax & Trade Blog

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Archives
    Archives Contains a list of blog posts that were created previously.

When a Canada Revenue Agency (the “CRA”) audit concludes and a Proposed Assessment issued, it is presented in a “Statement of Proposed Audit Adjustment”.  This document outlines the CRA’s Assessment of the additional taxes owed.  At this stage, significant work needs to take place to try and understand the basis for the Proposed Assessment and attempt to rebut the CRA’s Assessment position. 

Because CRA is the “elephant in the room” (and typically does what it wants to do), where an Assessment is finalized and raised, it is a very signification matter, for the following reasons.

Last modified on
Hits: 31
0

In Part 1 of this Series, we explored CRA’s recent increased taxation and audit activity in Canada’s Vaping Industry.  In Part 2 of this Series we explored Health Canada’s imminent ban on flavoured vaping products.  These three initiatives have created an unhappy trifecta that may signal major business difficulties for many vaping manufacturers, importers and retailers in 2025, and in our final Report, we raise concerns about the Government’s policy choices.

The Hazy Logic of Canada’s Regulatory Policy

One the one hand, Health Canada’s expected ban on flavoured vapes is focused on protecting vulnerable citizens (youth) and is laudable.  Similarly, CRA’s continued levels of high taxation in this industry help support Canada’s massive spending levels, helping reduce the significant debt we are already leaving to future generations.  At this level these policies seem to make sense.  On another level they also look rather suspect.

Last modified on
Hits: 141
0

In a previous blog, and Part 1 of this Series, we discussed CRA’s recent audit activity focussed on Canada’s Vaping Industry,  which is significantly impacting vaping licensees, and leading to a number of different assessments for duty liability under the under the Excise Act, 2001.  An even more serious governmental focal point, however, is likely to be Health Canada’s proposed regulatory ban on flavoured or sweetened vaping substances and products, which appears to be another significant storm brewing for the industry.

Part II of this series on the vaping industry focuses on this issue, its regulatory history, and the expected cataclysmic event it may entail for the economic viability of many of these businesses.

Last modified on
Hits: 240
0

Posted by on in Tobacco Blog

Canada’s federal and provincial taxes of “vaping products” is really a vaping duty imposed under the Excise Act, 2001(the “Vaping Duty” and “EA 2001”), and the CRA is in charge of administering that excise duty – Including related audit activities.

CRA appears to be ramping up its audit activity in this area, now issuing proposed and final assessments under the taxing provisions in EA 2001 sections 158.57, 158.58 and 158.61.

Last modified on
Hits: 263
0

As a firm specializing in International Trade and related regulatory issues, we have noticed a marked increase in recent inquiries regarding the new regulatory requirements for Nicotine Pouches.  This uptick coincides with Health Canada’s recent announcement effectively restricting the sale of Nicotine Replacement Therapies (“NRTs”), including Nicotine Pouches, to pharmacies – and the need to understand how comprehensive these apply to current business, and what options there are for moving forward.

Last modified on
Hits: 221
0

Toronto Office

10 Lower Spadina Avenue, Suite 200, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2Z2 Canada
Phone: (416) 864-6200| Fax: (416) 864-6201

Client Login

To access the Millar Kreklewetz LLP secure client file transfer system, please log in.