CALL US TODAY
(416) 864 - 6200

Tax & Trade Blog

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Archives
    Archives Contains a list of blog posts that were created previously.

Tax Appeals Gone Wrong: Losing Taxpayers Can be Forced to Pay Government Costs!

Posted by on in Tax Law
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 486
  • 0 Comments
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

One thing that usually goes undiscussed when contemplating appeals to the Tax Court of Canada (“TCC”) is what happens if a taxpayer loses.

One thing that CAN happen is a “costs award” against the taxpayer, which is where a TCC judge orders the taxpayer to pay a portion of the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) costs in defending the appeal – which puts a significant premium on understanding one’s “chances of success” BEFORE filing the appeal!

Unexpected Costs

In Watts, 2024 TCC 100, the TCC considered the DOJ’s request for $30,000 in costs against a losing taxpayer, who was regarded as wasting the Court’s time with a number of losing (and ‘meritless’) motions during the course of the Appeal.

As outlined in the prior reported substantive decision, also called Watts, 2023 TCC 11, the Appellant taxpayer was seen to had been assessed for $138,550 under section 160 of the Income Tax Act, and related to certain asset transfers from her husband (a tax preparer found guilty and jailed six years for creating fictitious tax losses to artificially decrease his client’s net incomes, and taking a percentage of the tax refund).  The taxpayer lost her substantive appeal because the transfer was regarded as a transfer for no consideration, at a time that the husband owed the CRA (a lot of) money, and the transfer was viewed as properly assessable against her under section 160. 

Problematically for the wife, however, she was also viewed as having brought a number of procedural motions that the TCC characterized as “without merit” and attempting to re-litigate matters already addressed in her husband’s own appeal some 10 years prior.

As the result, the TCC ordered $30,000 in costs against the taxpayer wife, based on her overall responsibility for costs of the DOJ as the losing party in the substantive appeal.

Takeaways

While many tax appeals are completely warranted, some are not and discerning between the two often requires professional advice – and a thorough understanding of what happens if you lose is necessary BEFORE a tax appeal is filed.

This all puts a premium on frank discussions about the merits of the appeal with one’s tax counsel – and actually listening to the advice of one’s counsel in these points.  (One suspects the taxpayer may have been deaf to her own Counsel’s good advice on these points!)

Indeed, one of the best questions a taxpayers can ask before initiating a tax appeal is simply, “What are my chances of winning?”

Want a PDF copy of this blog?

Last modified on
0

Comments

  • No comments made yet. Be the first to submit a comment

Leave your comment

Guest Saturday, 21 December 2024

Toronto Office

10 Lower Spadina Avenue, Suite 200, Toronto, Ontario, M5V 2Z2 Canada
Phone: (416) 864-6200| Fax: (416) 864-6201

Client Login

To access the Millar Kreklewetz LLP secure client file transfer system, please log in.